


The second challenge is to this decision (which I discussed here). The key issue seems to be whether the BSA should have given TVNZ notice that they were looking at concluding that the house wasn’t a brothel. One was argued last week, against this BSA decision, a finding that a Close Up story about a suburban brothel was inaccurate and unfair because there wasn’t sufficient evidence that the place was indeed a brothel. Important fact from the Crown’s application: the Crown’s case crucially revolves around the papers’ publication of material from communications intercepted by police: material that is (a) illegal to publish, (b) inadmissible in the trial, and (c) pretty damned prejudicial.įascinating issue: to what extent will the public interest in the information be relevant?īroadcasting Standards Authority challenges: TVNZ’s lawyer Willy Akel has two challenges to BSA decisions. It is shaping up to be the most significant contempt of court case in NZ’s history. Video Details Report Video Screenshots Share. 0 (0 votes) Add to Favorites Watch Later Add to New Playlist. This concerns several Fairfax newspapers’ “Terrorism Files” stories. 2.7m Followers, 500 Following, 744 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from Sophie Mudd (sophiemudd) 2.7m Followers, 499 Following, 744 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from Sophie Mudd (sophiemudd) sophiemudd. I like this video I dont like this video. That post garnered more than 160,000 likes and 1,200 comments. Her top barely covered her chest as she sat on a lounge chair with a cardigan that was partially falling off. The model uploaded a steamy snap in a white bikini as she soaked up some sun.
#Sophie mudd deskgram 4 years ago full#
My guess: the first challenge (the missing A-G report) will be struck out, and the case will be allowed to proceed on the second (the question of the inconsistency of the Act with the Bill of Rights).įairfax/Pankhurst contempt: set down for five days in the week beginning 15 September before a full bench of the High Court (two judges). As covered by The Inquisitr, Mudd returned to Instagram with a bang earlier this week. The Crown seeks to strike out both challenges, on the grounds that they are contravene Parliamentary privilege. Applicants John Boscawen, Garth McVicar, Rodney Hide, and Graham Stairmand now want the court to rule that the Attorney-General should have advised Parliament that the Electoral Finance Bill was inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act, and that the Electoral Finance Act, now that it’s passed, is inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act.

Budget leak: Nats’ behaviour “entirely appropriate”?Įlectoral Finance Act judicial review: strike-out application to be heard on 15 May.
#Sophie mudd deskgram 4 years ago free#
